Are Wireless Radiation Standards Strong Enough?

In 2020, residents of Pittsfield, Massachusetts, began reporting headaches, dizziness and sleep problems after a new cellphone tower started operating. Some believed the tower was responsible. The local Board of Health ordered Verizon to turn it off, but the order was later withdrawn after the company challenged the city in court.

The case raised questions about US wireless-radiation standards. The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, adopted its current limits in 1996, when people used far fewer wireless devices. The standards are mainly designed to prevent thermal effects, such as excessive heating of body tissue. Critics argue that they do not adequately consider possible biological effects that may occur without significant heating.

In 2019, the FCC reviewed the standards but decided not to change them. Public-health and environmental groups challenged this decision. In 2021, a federal appeals court ruled that the FCC had not properly explained why it rejected evidence concerning long-term exposure, children, modern wireless technology and environmental effects. The court ordered the FCC to provide a better explanation.

Scientists continue to disagree about the risks. Regulators and the wireless industry say that devices operating within current limits have not been proved harmful. Critics point to studies reporting possible effects on fertility, DNA, memory and the nervous system. A major US animal study also found evidence of certain tumours in male rats exposed to cellphone radiation.

Wireless technology has many benefits, but critics believe that safety rules should reflect modern research and today’s much greater exposure. They argue that reasonable precautions should be taken while scientists continue studying the possible long-term effects.

​

residents, people who live in a particular place
dizziness, the feeling that you may fall because everything seems to be moving
withdraw, to officially cancel or remove something
standards, official rules about quality or safety

thermal effects, changes caused by heat

body tissue, groups of cells that form parts of the body
long-term exposure, contact with something over a long period of time
federal appeals court, a court that reviews decisions made by lower courts
regulator, an official organization that controls an industry
fertility, the ability to produce children
tumour, an unusual growth of cells in the body
precaution, an action taken to prevent possible danger
current limits, the safety levels that are officially allowed

​

1. Do you think wireless radiation standards should be updated? Why or why not?

2. How many wireless devices do you use every day?

3. Do you think people use too many wireless devices today?

4. How would you feel if a new cellphone tower were built near your home?

5. Do you think the residents of Pittsfield had good reasons to be concerned?

6. Should local governments be able to turn off cellphone towers because of health complaints?

7. Why might children be more affected by wireless radiation than adults?

8. Do you think safety standards from 1996 are suitable for modern technology?

9. Why is it difficult for scientists to study the long-term effects of wireless radiation?

10. Should companies have to prove that a new technology is safe before selling it?

11. Who should be responsible for protecting the public: governments, companies, scientists, or individuals?

12. Do you trust information about wireless radiation from the telecommunications industry? Why or why not?

13. What precautions could people take to reduce their exposure to wireless radiation?

14. Would you be willing to use your cellphone less because of possible health risks?

15. Do the benefits of wireless technology outweigh the possible risks?

16. Should schools limit the use of wireless devices in classrooms?

17. Would you prefer to use wired internet at home? Why or why not?

18. How could cellphone towers affect animals and the environment?

19. Should governments follow the precautionary principle when scientific evidence is uncertain?

20. What further research would you like scientists to conduct on wireless radiation?

​

​